Some neuroscientists have begun to postulate that people don't use reason when making a decision. Instead, they use reason & logic after the fact to justify a decision that has already been made. I don't know how true this is, but you saw hints of this phenomenon from Kat.
Kat was hurt that Kim didn't take her on the reward. Kat wants to hurt Kim in return. She faces two immediate logical obstacles in justifying/rationalizing her anger:
1. Chelsea might have been more deserving to go on the reward than Kat was.
2. Most of the tribe didn't go on the reward. Kat wasn't singled out. Sabrina is a core alliance member, and she didn't get picked either.
Kat used sophistry to dismiss point 1 ("we're all hungry"). Kim didn't say Kat wasn't hungry, she said Chelsea had eaten less than Kat. Kat is willfully ignoring that there might be a distinction between Chelsea and herself and creating a false equivalency. Yes, they are both hungry, but that's not the issue - the issue is who is more deserving to go based on past rewards.
As for point 2, Kat can't openly complain too much about being denied a reward that was also denied others. This is where her wheels really started turning - I'm not really upset about the reward ... I don't want to be seen as a weak player... I didn't come out here to be a follower.... A move against Kim would show I'm a bold player ...
Kat wants to hurt Kim. It's all because of her petty anger and jealousy of being denied the reward. She can't say it. She can't even think it. So, she's rationalizing another reason why she might vote against Kim - and Troy is giving her all the justifications she needs to do so. Kim has to get rid of Kat next - Kat is too dangerous in her state.
The reason this is dangerous for all the girls, not just Kim, is that Troy now thinks Kat is his project. If Kat moves against Kim and is successful - Troy will think it was his doing. If Kat makes the finals - Troy will DEFINITELY vote for Kat (after all, in Troy's mind, she'll be there because she listened to Troy's wisdom). This argument might also gain traction with the rest of the men on the jury (i.e., Kim was the mastermind who took the men out, but Kat saw the light and took out Kim - let's vote for Kat).
So, the rest of the girls have to take both Kim and Kat out before the final three - either one is shaping up to be the favorite to win a jury vote. However, people are really running out of time to make a move against Kim seeing as she still has the idol.
So, the rest of the girls have to take both Kim and Kat out before the final three - either one is shaping up to be the favorite to win a jury vote. However, people are really running out of time to make a move against Kim seeing as she still has the idol.
Other thoughts:
- That reward challenge is the ultimate pickle. They've run it at least 10 times, and I think it's usually not worth winning. So, why did Kim win it and then complain about it for the rest of the day? Has she ever watched the show? Does she know you are allowed to throw a challenge if you want?
- Christina was voted least deserving to be there when Tarzan is still around?!?!?! OUCH!!!!
- Sabrina was voted as doing the least around camp? I didn't see that one coming.
- Troy said the pig was 170 lbs. and they never were going to catch it. He was wrong on both counts. The swine was half that weight and Michael Skupin killed a pig of similar size on Survivor: Australia. Troy made the comment that the girls were crazy to think we could catch it AFTER Troy had made a considerable effort, and failed to do so. How convenient for Troy to fail at a task, and then declare it impossible. The impossible mission for Troy was saving himself after he lost immunity. Catching a pig has been done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sj8iPlmeNQ
P.S. Yes, that is Elisabeth Hasselbeck from The View showing off her abs in the clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sj8iPlmeNQ
P.S. Yes, that is Elisabeth Hasselbeck from The View showing off her abs in the clip.
No comments:
Post a Comment